November 11th, 2009
When Medicare was first enacted in 1965, men had an average life expectancy of almost 70 years. So the average guy received Medicare benefits for 5 years.
Now the average male lives to be about 75, and the average guy receives benefits for twice as long.
In January of last year, the first babyboomers started retiring. This massive wave of retirees will start receiving Medicare benefits, and be spending so much that Medicare trustees predict funds will run out in 2019.
At the same time,
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
November 11th, 2009
Learn how your HSA-qualified plan must be effective no later than December 1st in order to qualify for a 2009 tax deductible HSA contribution (which could reduce your April 15th taxes by $1900 or more!).
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
November 6th, 2009
The Congressional rush continues towards a reckless takeover of healthcare. Nancy Pelosi is hoping to schedule a vote for tomorrow at 6 pm. It is certain that she will get zero Republican votes, and uncertain whether she has the Democrat votes she needs.
Those who support this bill and claim to be for more competition, are really against allowing true competition by enabling people to choose the type of health coverage they want, and purchase across state lines.
Instead of legislation which
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
November 2nd, 2009
On Friday I called my Congressional representative Betsy Markey. I wasn't able to speak directly to her, but I did get a call back from her representative, and we had a nice long talk.
The main thing we talked about how was much the premiums will go up on our customers, and her constituents, if this healthcare reform passes. (That's looking like a bigger "IF" than ever, by the way).
When it happens, it will be easy to look back in history and see where this has occurred before. In the late
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 30th, 2009
Will Health Savings Accounts be part of the future healthcare bill? Well, its starting to look questionable whether anything will even pass, but if so, here’s where things stand with Health Savings Accounts:
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 28th, 2009
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has now announced that the health care legislation he is drafting will include a government-run health insurance plan, or so-called “public option”. At least the most liberal of the liberals out there are being honest about this, and are for it because it will lead to a single-payer system. But most of the Democrats that support this are saying its purpose is to “increase competition” and “keep the insurance companies honest.”
Politicians saying
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 23rd, 2009
One of the ways Congress plans to change health insurance is to interfere with market pricing based on sex. Anytime government gets involved in the pricing of privately sold goods and services there are some unintended consequences. In this video I talk about what some of those are.
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 22nd, 2009
Anyone wonder why it took a week, after voting to pass a healthcare reform bill, for the Senate Finance Committee to post it for the public to view?
All 1500 pages are now available to read here:
http://finance.senate.gov/press/Bpress/2009press/prb101909.pdf
Turns out that Senators from "red" states are taking care of themselves in this bill.
Senator Harry Reid's state of Nevada will be exempt from increased Medicaid expenses that other states will face, for the first 5 years of Obamacare.
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 20th, 2009
The healthcare reform bills working their way through congress have a lot of fundamental features that people just don’t want. A recent survey conducted by the non-partisan research firm International Communications Research found the following:
71% oppose the individual mandate
Only 21% said they would support a law saying everyone would have to obtain health insurance approved by the government, or pay a tax of $750 or more every year.
68% oppose reducing seniors’ health benefits
One
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »
October 19th, 2009
I recorded this to explain the penalty that will be imposed on anyone who does not follow the government mandate to purchase health insurance. While forcing people to buy health insurance is really not the best way to approach things, part of the purpose of this mandate is to bring in enough money to pay the claims of the unhealthy.
As things are being structure, this is not going to work.
| Continue reading this entry »
Posted in General Healthcare Debate | No Comments »